In the world of product recalls, the one which has received the most attention is the “Nursing Cream for Dry Skin” sold by Procter & Gamble (PG) and associated with the outbreak of salmonella contamination. The product was recalled because it was sold in three different sizes and with three different types of formulation. It also contained a component that would not break down with regular use, making it unsafe for use on infants.

There are many instances in the history of consumer products where people have ignored known risks and done things that turned out to be very dangerous. This type of recall is not any different.

The problem with the PGA nursing cream for dry skin is that when used by infants or small children, it contained methylisothiazolinone, a substance that breaks down into a toxic chemical when exposed to oxygen. Many people have said that this particular ingredient is quite effective at treating acne but when used by very young babies and infants, it is not safe for them. Instead of cleaning their face, it can cause their respiratory systems to become inflamed.

Many people believe that the use of this product can lead to other serious side effects, such as memory loss, developmental problems, and even death. While the recall does not appear to have caused these problems, it is not good for public perception when something that has been shown to be dangerous to infants or children becomes the subject of an expensive lawsuit.

The unfortunate part about the PGA nursing cream for dry skin is that the company that was selling it has already settled its own lawsuit. An attorney who specializes in such cases said that there was only so much the company could do because the level of negligence by the manufacturer is considered to be “negligent indifference.”

This can be a tricky case because this type of medical malpractice often does not require the level of damages typically associated with accidents or incidents which cause death. Instead, it involves the defendant having sold a product that did not perform properly and that ultimately led to serious harm to consumers, especially those who use products that have been proven to be ineffective in treating specific types of skin conditions.

While the overall injuries that were caused by the PGA nursing cream for dry skin may be relatively minor, the company could end up paying a lot of money for a defective product. In fact, it appears that the only way the plaintiffs can get any compensation from the company is if they are able to prove that it was grossly negligent, in which case they would not receive anything at all.

In the case of this particular product, it does not appear that the PGA ever received any type of monetary settlement from the sale of the product. Instead, it became the victim of a marketing campaign which had successfully branded it as a health and beauty product that could work wonders for your skin. If you decide to use this product, it is best to make sure that you are buying a full-featured nursing cream and that you are aware of the potential dangers.